Reprinted from www.libertylobby.org, home of The SPOTLIGHT archive
'Goldilocks' Story and the U.S. Economy
By Seth Sandronsky
You know the story. We live in prosperous times. Mr. Dow and Mr. Jones can't complain. Neither too hot (we've avoided inflation) nor too cold (we've avoided recession and high unemployment). Our "Goldilocks economy" is the envy of the world. End of story, right? Think again.
Economist Jim Devine warns that our prosperity rests on the growth of debt that we can't sustain.
According to Devine, the problem for the American economy can be likened to the story of "Goldilocks and the Three Bears."
Papa Bear represents the steep rise in consumer indebtedness. Mama Bear stands for the steep rise in U.S. external indebtedness. And Baby Bear depicts the increased indebtedness of non-financial corporations.
United for a Fair Economy reports: "Total revolving consumer credit -- most of it credit card debt -- has more than tripled from $185.9 billion in January 1990 to $584.3 billion in October 1999." Workers borrow to make up for falling wages, which have just begun to rise.
"The recent gain in wages is a welcome reversal of long-term wage decline, but most working families are still playing catch-up," economist Jared Bernstein said.
Their lost ground has led to the wealthiest one percent of Americans own ing more wealth than the bottom 90 percent.
Changing relations between employers and employees have fueled this wage inequality.
For example, the Boeing Corporation wants to cut the life insurance and wages of technical workers. Sacramento County, Calif., has cut the health insurance and salaries of entry-level workers. Public and private employers also cut their employees' wages with unstable work.
A study at the University of Califor nia in San Francisco found that in 1999 "only a third of California workers have 'traditional jobs' -- that is, single, permanent, full-time, day-shift work paid for by an employer at the employer's site." Part-time, contract and other non-full-time workers represent 10 percent of the work force nationwide, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Lower and less stable wages, in turn, cause American workers to sink further into red ink.
"Total household debt has jumped from 85 percent of personal income in 1992 to 103 percent last year" The Economist noted.
Debt-financed spending has another consequence. Namely, the U.S. private savings rate continues to drop, notes Robert Blecker in his book, The Ticking Debt Bomb. Under capitalism, over-borrowing causes under-saving for the working majority.
America's more than $300 billion-per-year trade deficit is larger in terms of its percentage of gross domestic product than at any time in history. Our trade deficit is the imbalance between what we buy and sell around the world. Americans are borrowing to buy foreign goods on the cheap, Devine pointed out.
From where does this dough flow? During a two-year period ending in December 1998, our financial debt to foreign lenders tripled to $1.5 trillion, according to the Financial Markets Center.
"Month after month, year after year, the U.S. trade deficit sets new records," Blecker writes. "And as the United States borrows to cover the excess of its imports over its exports, the U.S. position as the world's largest debtor grows by leaps and bounds. Closely related to both of these trends is the drop in the U.S. private savings rate, which forces the country to continue borrowing from abroad in spite of the shift from a deficit to a surplus in the federal budget balance."
He continues: "In fact, the U.S. economy's current prosperity rests on the fragile foundations of a consumer spending boom based on a domestic stock market bubble, combined with foreign bankrolling of the U.S. trade deficit. If present trends continue, the growth in the U.S. international debt will not be sustainable. No country can continue to borrow so much from abroad without eventually triggering a depreciation of its currency and a contraction of its economy.
"The rising trade deficit and mushrooming foreign debt are thus warning signals of underlying problems that -- if not corrected -- could bring the U.S. economic boom crashing to a halt in the not-too-distant future."
Could there be a lesson from the recent past here? Recall the praise for the steep growth of the East Asian "tiger economies" before they crashed in the summer of 1997. Some of the nations of East Asia grew on debt, thanks to foreign lenders. In this respect, East Asia's former prosperity resembles our Goldi locks economy today.
However, there are important differences, Devine cautions. Here's one: America can repay its international debts with dollars. The East Asian nations couldn't use their currencies to pay foreign lenders.
Corporate America is also caught in the debt trap.
"During the past two years, non-financial corporations increased their debts by $900 billion, while they retired a net $460 billion of equity, The Economist noted in its Jan. 28 issue.
"The main reason for these buy-backs is so that firms can pay employees in share options without depressing the share price," The Economist explained. "In effect, therefore, firms are borrowing to finance their pay bill [payroll] and to prop up share prices."
This trend favors the richest people in America. Devine points to the increased value of executive stock options as a case in point.
Meanwhile, the corporate news media cheers the Goldilocks economy. Expect more of this in the wake of the recent America Online-Time Warner merger that heralds the transformation of the Internet into a global shopping mall.
It's unclear how long our Goldilocks economy can grow on borrowed money. Yet one thing is clear. The arrival of the Three Bears will eliminate any global envy, real or imagined.